A team at Texas A&M University consisting of Dr. Abdoulaye Djire, assistant professor, and graduate student Denis Johnson, has furthered a method to produce ammonia through electrochemical processes. The research aims to replace the Haber-Bosch thermochemical process with an electrochemical process that is more sustainable and safer for the environment.

Ammonia is commonly used in fertilizer because it has the highest nitrogen content of commercial fertilizers, making it essential for crop production. However, two carbon dioxide molecules are made for every molecule of ammonia produced, sourced from the raw material natural gas that contributes to excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

The researchers recently published their findings in Nature Scientific Reports.

Since the early 1900s, the Haber-Bosch process has been used to produce ammonia. This process works by reacting atmospheric nitrogen with hydrogen gas. A downside of the Haber-Bosch process is that it requires high pressure and high temperature, leaving a large energy footprint. The method also requires hydrogen feedstock, which is derived from the nonrenewable resource natural gas. It is not sustainable and has negative implications on the environment, expediting the need for new and environmentally friendly processes.

The researchers have proposed using the electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) to produce ammonia from atmospheric nitrogen and water. The benefits of using an electrochemical method include using water to provide protons and the ability to produce ammonia at ambient temperature and pressure. This process would potentially require lower amounts of energy and would be less costly and more environmentally friendly than the Haber-Bosch process.

The NRR works by using an electrocatalyst. For this process to succeed, nitrogen must bond to the surface and break apart to produce ammonia. In this study, the researchers used MXene, a titanium nitride, as the electrocatalyst. What differentiates this catalyst from others is that nitrogen is already in its structure, allowing for more efficient ammonia formation.

Johnson explained, “It’s easier for ammonia to form because the protons can attach to the nitrogen in the structure, form the ammonia and then the ammonia will leave out of the structure. A hole is made in the structure that can pull the nitrogen gas in and separate the triple bond.”

SEM imaging of Ti2AlN MAX phase, upper left, molten salt treated MAX phase, upper right, multilayer Ti2N MXene lower left, and few layer Ti2N MXene, lower right. The lateral size of the individual MXene flakes is roughly 5 μm. The image is best seen at the Nature Scientific Reports link above and clicking the Full Size Image box. Image Credit: Texas A&M University.

The researchers found that using titanium nitride induces a Mars-van Krevelen mechanism, a popular mechanism for hydrocarbon oxidation. This mechanism follows a lower energy pathway that would allow for higher ammonia production rates and selectivity because of the nitrogen from the titanium nitride catalyst.

Without modifications to the materials, the researchers reached a selectivity of 20%, which is the ratio of the desired product formed compared to the undesired product formed. Their method could potentially reach a higher selectivity percentage with modifications, forging a new pathway to ammonia production through electrochemical processes.

Johnson also noted, “The Department of Energy has set a goal of a selectivity of 60%, which is a challenging number to reach. We were able to reach 20% using our material, showcasing a method that we might be able to take advantage of moving forward. If we upgrade our material, can we reach 60% soon? That is the question we will continue to work to answer.”

This research could potentially reduce the carbon footprint and global energy usage on a larger scale.

Djire added, “In the future, this could be a major scientific reform. About 2% of the world’s total energy is used for ammonia production. Reducing that huge number would drastically reduce our carbon footprint and energy consumption.”

The study was funded by the Startup Research Fund. Other contributors to the publication are Eric Kelley from the chemical engineering department at Texas A&M, Brock Hunter from Auburn University, and Jevaun Christie and Cullan King from Prairie View A&M University.


At posting the entire paper is available to read and covers the process in good detail for creating the catalyst hopefully be replication. What’s missing is the power input compared to the yield. Making the claim that a electrochemical nitrogen reduction is going to be much better hinges on the totality of the inputs vs the yield, and that data is not there.

Its likely that Haber- Bosch consumes more fuel for heating and pressurization. How much a electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction needs in fuel for electrical charge remains unknown.

The DOE’s 60% selectivity goal is just that, a goal. The important number is going to be the energy cost going into each process so to determine whether the immense sunk investment in Haber-Bosch would be cast overboard and replaced by a new investment in an electrochemical nitrogen system.


Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind