Dec
20
Platinum Lead Fuel Cell Catalyst Clears 50,000 Cycles
December 20, 2016 | 2 Comments
Schematic diagram of the oxygen reduction reaction (reduction of O2 into H2O) on the Pt(110) surface of the PtPb/Pt nanoplates, with purple representing Pt atoms and orange representing Pb atoms. Click image for the largest view. Image Credit: Brookhaven National Laboratory.
The catalysts are “nanoplates” that contain an atomically ordered platinum (Pt) and lead (Pb) core surrounded by a thick uniform shell of four Pt layers.
The background is fuel cells are a promising technology for clean and efficient electrical power generation, but their cost, activity, and durability are key challenges to commercialization. Today’s fuel cells use expensive Pt-based nanoparticles as catalysts to accelerate the reactions involved in converting the chemical energy from renewable fuels – such as hydrogen, methanol, and ethanol – into electrical energy. Catalysts that incorporate less expensive metals inside the nanoparticles can help reduce cost and improve activity and durability, but further improvements to these catalysts are required before these fuel cells can be used in vehicles, generators, and other applications.
So far the most successful catalysts for boosting the activity of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) – a very slow reaction that significantly limits fuel cell efficiency – have been of the Pt-based core-shell structure. However, these catalysts typically have a thin and incomplete shell (owing to their difficult synthesis), which over time allows the acid from the fuel cell environment to leach into the core and react with the other metals inside, resulting in poor long-term stability and a short catalyst lifetime.
Corresponding author Dong Su said, “The goal is to make the ORR as fast as possible with catalysts that have the least amount of platinum and the most stable operation over time. Our PtPb/Pt catalysts show high ORR activity and stability – two parameters that are key to enabling a hydrogen economy – placing them among the most efficient and stable bimetallic catalysts reported for ORR.” Su is a scientist at Brookhaven Lab’s Center for Functional Nanomaterials (CFN), a DOE Office of Science User Facility, who led the electron microscopy work to characterize the nanoplates.
In previous studies, scientists have shown that ORR activity can be optimally enhanced in core-shell catalysts by compressing the Pt atoms on one specific lattice surface plane called Pt(111). This compressive strain is induced by adding metals smaller in size than Pt, such as nickel, to the shell’s core, and has the effect of weakening the binding of oxygen to the Pt surface, where the catalytic reaction takes place.
Su explained, “The ideal ORR catalyst needs to help break bonds (between oxygen molecules) and form bonds (between oxygen and hydrogen), so oxygen can’t be too strongly or too weakly bound to the platinum surface. Scientists have focused their research on the compressively strained Pt(111) surfaces, in which Pt atoms are squeezed across the surface, because the oxygen binding energy is optimized. In general, scientists thought that tensile strain on the same surface plane would result in overly strong binding of oxygen and thus hinder the ORR reaction.”
But Su and his collaborators showed that introducing a large tensile strain along one direction of a different surface plane, Pt(110), could also improve ORR catalytic activity. They added Pb (which is larger than Pt) to the core of the Pt shell, causing the Pt atoms to stretch across the surface.
After the research group led by Xiaoqing Huang, corresponding author from Soochow University, synthesized the nanoplates, Su characterized their structure and elemental composition at the Brookhaven CFN. Using electron diffraction patterns and images from high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), both of which reveal the relative positions of atoms, he confirmed the core-shell structure and the composition and sequence of the atoms. To verify that the core contained Pt and Pb and that the shell contained Pt, he measured the change in energy of the electrons after they interacted with the nanoplates – a technique called electron energy-loss spectroscopy.
With this information, the team distinguished how the nanoplates formed with the individual Pt and Pb atoms. To their surprise, the surface planes were not Pt(111) but Pt(110), and these Pt(110) planes were under biaxial strain – compressive strain in one direction and tensile strain in the other – originating from the PtPb core.
In durability tests simulating fuel cell voltage cycling, Su’s collaborators found that after 50,000 cycles there was almost no change in the amount of generated electrical current. In other words, the nanoplates had minimal decay in catalytic activity. After this many cycles, most catalysts exhibit some activity loss, with some losing more than half of their original activity.
Microscopy and synchrotron characterization techniques revealed that the structure and elemental composition of the nanoplates did not change following durability testing. “The electron microscopy work at CFN was critical in explaining why our nanoplates showed such high catalytic activity and stability,” said Huang.
Compared to commercial Pt-on-carbon (Pt/C) catalysts, the team’s PtPb/Pt nanoplates have one of the highest ORR activities to date, taking the amount of Pt used into account, and excellent durability. The team’s nanoplates also showed high electrocatalytic activity and stability in oxidation reactions of methanol and ethanol.
“We believe the relatively thick and complete Pt layers play an important role in protecting the core,” said Su.
To understand how the high ORR activity originates in the nanoplates, the scientists calculated the binding energy between oxygen atoms and Pt atoms on the surface. Their calculations confirmed the tensile strain on the Pt(110) surface was responsible for the enhanced ORR activity.
Corresponding author Shaojun Guo of Peking University said, “This work opens up a new way to introduce large tensile strain on the stable Pt(110) plane to achieve very high activity for oxygen reduction catalysis. We believe that our approach will inspire efforts to design new nanostructured catalysts with large tensile strain for more efficient catalysis.”
Eventually, the laboratory-level electrocatalysts will need to be tested in a larger fuel cell system, where real-world variables, such as pollutants that could impact surface reactivity, can be introduced.
There is a very long road to go for this development, and platinum fuels cells are already falling behind simply because of cost. But 50,000 cycles without noteworthy degradation will have a major effect on the cost benefit analysis. If a fuel cell can run decades and use common fuels like methanol or ethanol – the game would be very different from the parameters we think about now.
Comments
2 Comments so far
Feedburner
Reddit
Stumbleupon
Nice, but one serious flaw: Hydrogen is not a renewable fuel with present technology, it is only an intermediary, an energy carrier. So for the time being the “hydrogen society” free from pollution,is depending on cheap, pollution free primary energy to become a viable alternative to other energy carriers. In industrialized countries, with reliable power grids, the battery, or supercapacitor will win, at least in the short run. Here in Norway,the battery powered EV´s already have a 20% share of new car sales. Fuel cells amount to practically zero despite Toyota’s promotion. The running cost for hydrogen with our el tariffs (10c/kWh) are projected to about four times that for a battery vehicle, or about equal to a combustion engine. So until abundant cheap hydrogen is on tap, like water and electricity in your home, the battery wins.
Correct, but the enthusiasts don’t grasp that.