The BP well blowout, fire, explosion and platform collapse, and the ensuing crude oil leak are without doubt the result of human failings.  Underestimating the quality of the reservoir is one reason, perhaps some engineering choices and safety oversights, inadequate equipment, testing that didn’t work out in the real world and all the rest only show that human planning can come up short.

Now that its over this writer can recoil from the anger felt as the catastrophe unfolded.  Yes, the well getting away is cause No. 1 – something that has happened before and will happen again – hopefully with more and more infrequency.  The lessons keep coming – from drilling into the earth since Drake’s day; the pressures down there can surprise you.

But the sorrow of the lives lost was quickly overcome by the shear idiocy of the media and political response.  There has been essentially no worthy information making the mainstream press or incorporated into political activity.  The reverse is the fact – misinformation is rampant and the consequences, not counting the loss of life itself is simply incredible.

The President’s behavior has been an utter failure – doing far more damage than the oil itself.  The offshore drilling ban is keeping 50,000 jobs without paychecks topping $2 billion in payroll losses alone, not counting the effect throughout the local economy in the situation where the major economic engine, tourism, disappeared.  The President’s action wasn’t just foolish, but cruelly focused on a few innocents, thoughtless and without any kind of leadership or sense of responsibility to the local area or the nation as a whole.  The reaction actually fed the media hysteria – a fault beyond forgiving in a leader.  No gulf beach trips and minigolf photoshoots will take away the realization the President is out of his league.

In the meantime property values are gong to be hit with incomes going down.  From Texas to Florida the tourism business is in shambles and may take years to recover.

There are many reports that no one is buying Gulf seafood, even in areas unaffected by the spill. Gulf Coast shrimpers and fishermen are in a tough spot: On the one hand, as more areas of the Gulf are declared safe, they presumably won’t be able to collect compensation from BP or the government and will have to get back to work; on the other hand, no one’s buying their catch. Given the public fear of toxins in food, this problem could last a long time.  But this writer is buying – Gulf seafood – if you can find it, hasn’t been so reasonably priced in decades.

For the future perhaps the most important lesson is the current administration can’t be trusted to act in the national interest.  Bans, moratoriums and other fear based knee-jerk reactions have spoiled regulatory certainty, which will exact a huge cost from oil firms, their shareholders, management and employees and in particular we consumers. Some insider reports suggest that oil assets in the Gulf are already being disposed of at fire-sale prices.  Fear leading fear, just what an economic recovery can not stand.

The most damning realization is the most liberal administration in American history is composed of people who lack the reflexive skepticism that intelligence and science apply to the mainstream media and those left-wing blogs. Spend some time following the reporting and blogging on Deepwater Horizon, and you come to realize that the administration’s behavior in the crisis likely wasn’t based on a cynical progressive master plan.  The administration was overwhelmed by sheer emotional panic about the magnitude of the potential disaster it faced as outlined by its most loyal supporters.  Embarrassing to thoughtful knowledgeable citizens.

Here is why.  What President Obama called the “worst environmental disaster America has ever faced” – the oil has pretty much already disappeared into the environment.  The disaster was a man made broad-based failure on the part of the media, the science establishment, and the federal bureaucracy. With the nation and its leaders looking for facts, information was replaced with a massive plume of apocalyptic disinformation and threats of losing a significant part of the coastline to the goo.

While the leaking oil was terrible in many resects the magnitude was vastly over wrought.  In June a slick computer-modeled animated video showed a gigantic part of the spill making its way around the southern tip of Florida and up the East Coast. Oil covered everything from the Gulf to the Grand Banks.  The New York Daily News said, “BP Oil Slick Could Hit East Coast In Weeks: Government Scientists.”  CBS, MSNBC and many others followed on.  The video was a huge YouTube hit.  It was one of history’s most successful news frauds from the National Center for Atmospheric Research – paid for by taxpayers.  Then the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) disavowed the scenario.  Too late, who ever hears about the recantations when the media screws up?

Watson Technical Consulting of Savannah, Ga. a firm specializing in computer modeling of the effects of hurricanes, seismic events, geophysical hazards, and weapons of mass destruction asserts the simulation was bogus from the very beginning, because it ignored important conditions in the Gulf. Furthermore, says Chuck Watson, the media never took account of how diluted the oil would be once it got around Florida, through the Gulf Stream and finally got to the Atlantic: The bulk of the theoretically massive spill the video shows amounts to roughly a quart of oil per square mile. Watson claims flat-out that NOAA was “gold digging” for grants as there’s probably more federal research money floating around the Gulf than there is oil. “There is a feeding frenzy with people trying to get funding for their specialty,” he said.  Never let a disaster go wasted or some such cleverness from the administration – does that sound like people that can be trusted?

The coffin for this writer was the “Giant Plumes” of oil.  Here the lying got very creative and flunked high school general science class.  Halfway into May coming up with oil on the surface was getting problematic so some marine researchers were drafted to provide the answer.  Water tests were showing oil in small quantities under the water’s surface from wave action, but how much no one could say nor, obviously, was there any peer reviewed literature to check on the known facts.

Media reports implied and even tried to assert that “enormous oil plumes” were waiting, like nuclear submarines, to rise and attack unsuspecting beaches and wetlands. The New York Times summed up the media consensus on May 15: “Scientists are finding enormous oil plumes in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, including one as large as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide, and 300 feet thick in spots. The discovery is fresh evidence that the leak from the broken undersea well could be substantially worse than estimates that the government and BP have given.” The article quoted Samantha Joye, a marine-sciences professor at the University of Georgia, as saying that this oil was mixed with water in the consistency of “thin salad dressing.”  Except there weren’t any plumes at all, let alone any ‘salad dressing’ type stuff.

By the end of May NOAA, where some grownups still have responsibility, released a study finding weak concentrations of oil in the area surrounding the Deepwater Horizon site at only 0.5 parts per million, maximum. The median was a little over 0.2 parts per million.

Again as the “giant” spill that threatened the East Coast, that’s barely above the threshold of detection.  By late July and early August, BP, the Federal Government, and some independent researchers were saying they couldn’t find any plumes at all. “We’re finding hydrocarbons around the well, but as we move away from the well, they move to almost background traces in the water column,” said Admiral Thad Allen, the administration’s point man on the spill. By then some 75 percent of the oil released is gone – and that’s based on new estimates that put the spill rate at the high end of earlier projections.

The giant-plume threat was greatly overstated by scientists and further blown out of proportion by the media. This writer believes those ‘scientists’ are not scientists at all.  As everyone who passed high school general science knows, oil is lighter than water and rises above it in all known situations on this planet. The idea of underwater plumes defies everything that we know about the physical laws on earth.  It’s been a great source of irritation and anger for weeks.  It’s a very good thing the notion is so incredibly dumb that its funny – but watching people report it is to see a stunning display of ignorance.  Are there no fact checkers left in the mass media?

The Gulf of Mexico and some of the coast of California are warm ecological systems where oil seeps are part of the food chain.  The leak was a bonanza for oil eating bacteria and the bacteria bonanza will work its way up the food chain with its abundance.  While the leak was perhaps a four-fold increase in the annual oil supply to the Gulf, the natural ecosystem adjusted quite well and as seen decades ago in the Mexican leak – it’s a very short-term matter. Truly it’s a disaster not to be left unused – by bacteria.

Dispersants turn thick, ugly slicks into widely distributed droplets, minimizing damage to beaches and sensitive wetlands.  When slicks are broken up the light oil parts evaporate, and the bacteria more easily eat the heavier parts.  Corexit is thought to be the major dispersant used in the treatment – something you shouldn’t spray directly on coral, marshlands or other living things as it’s a detergent like chemical.  Corexit has made lots of disinformation news too, even being a subject for a Congressional hearing.  But the EPA who recently started proceedings to make milk spills hazardous material type events has approved Corexit in supervised use.  In a reality check using dispersants is to break up oil before it gets to shore, piles up and gets out of the water – where the oil breakdown slows down and gets quite messy for wildlife and the flora.  It’s a very good thing the EPA kept its act together and the disbursements flowing – an issue of debate that did have some suspense.

Finally, this writer has a question for everyone – where is the link to the reputable gulf shrimp supplier – I’d like a five gallon bucket full, packed in dry ice for a 3 day UPS ground trip. A shrimp feast might make the anger recede a little more.

In closing, people lost their lives and condolences are due their families and herewith are heartfelt given.  Jobs are lost, suffering and troubles are mounting, so this writer is speaking out for you and will be your customer again.

The disaster isn’t about oil anymore, it’s the impact of media and politics – something that should and could be fixed in just a few words by just one man.  Do you think it will happen?


15 Comments so far

  1. BP News on August 18, 2010 1:50 AM

    […] the rest of this great post here Comments (0)    Posted in BP News   […]

  2. Sander van Rossen on August 18, 2010 1:55 AM

    What do you mean politically polarized post?

    “The administration was overwhelmed by sheer emotional panic”

    I don’t think so, I think it had more to do with the fact that nobody in the government had the expertise to deal with this situation, and since obviously no other oil company would want to burn their hands on this situation, they where at the mercy of BP.

    They couldn’t take too much charge of the situation because that would make BP feel like they where relieved of their responsibility.

    I suspect BP just stalled with sealing the well because they wanted their relief well to be finished first.
    That way they’d have an excuse to continue extracting the oil.
    If they closed the well, they might never get the chance to open it again.

    Everything is about money after all, everything else is not important.
    Pieces of paper and numbers on computers have become more important than actual people, actual productivity and sustaining our environment.
    We live in an illusion.

  3. WoW Achievements: Flirt with disaster | DotA Zona on August 18, 2010 2:25 AM

    […] The Oil Spill Disaster That Isn't | New Energy and Fuel […]

  4. Oil Spill News on August 18, 2010 2:31 AM

    […] the rest of this great post here Comments (0)    Posted in Oil Spill   […]

  5. JPK on August 18, 2010 4:47 AM

    When anyone lives in an illusion, they avoid participating in a particular cleanup operation in areas affected by an oil spill, especially in the Gulf of Mexico. Anyone in the U.S. needs to get the act together in cleaning up the seas, to settle things down before something happens, and to stop the acrimonious wranglings so that they can proceed with the operation smoothly.

    Also, what some people fail to realize is that romanticism of everything that seems important to others – including me, of course – like, say, sustainable development (what?! Does anybody mean sustaining our environment?), actual people (can anyone please discuss about it very carefully? Is it emotional to understand this right now?), actual productivity (better debate on its own merits, PLEASE!), and the like.

    It is a feeling, I believe, that there is anything to do with the differences in people’s mind about what I call “an ideology of environmentalism”, and ordinary people around the globe (such as me) must understand the true ulterior motives, the perception, and the political capital behind the “eco-facade” and the like. Could that happen, really?

    It is not easy to make the case for preventing the oil spill or a particular problem from happening ever again, but we, ordinary people, need to find out how environmentalism or any other ideological and philosopical phenomenon – with the help of experts who are good at investigating the impact of such motives not only on environmental conservation & protection, but also social and economic reforms, public governance & safety, energy, communications and transportation improvements, and many more.

    Before proving the point – and before utilizing any simple or complex solution you find – please debate on the ideological and philosopical merits of environmentalism before the situation gets out of hand. So get into it – right now!

  6. Foot 101 on August 18, 2010 8:19 PM

    The Oil Spill Disaster That Isn?t…

    I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…

  7. russ on August 19, 2010 10:57 PM

    Good post and totally different from the green mass hysteria sludge that is normally written.

    The science team that Obama put together is a joke. They should have selected oil men from the industry and universities – would have been much more useful.

  8. Stuart on August 20, 2010 1:58 PM

    Were you hired by BP to write this? So many obvious mistatements of the facts. This is a HUGE disaster and effects will be felt for years to come.
    And by the way, Oil plumes do exist and are being studied by USF. They recently posted an article about it. The oil did not just disappear.
    Can’t stand it when idiots like you write.

  9. JPK on August 20, 2010 5:08 PM

    In my view, oil plumes do exist, is it not? Can someone please consider carefully about this pheonomenon?
    Environmentalism is the main concern regarding the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico which may still affect fisheries, tourism sector, etc. – and people in the US must understand why is the eco-ideology corrupting the mind, misleading them into knowing about the spillage, etc.
    Can somebody please think carefully now about environmentalism, too? Thank you.

  10. Venessa Listen on August 27, 2011 2:16 AM

    I’ve just started off a blog, the knowledge you give on this site has aided me extremely. Thank you for all your time & work.

  11. Monte Gowler on September 5, 2011 6:03 PM

    This post makes a lot of sense !

  12. Tifany Harlan on September 8, 2011 11:33 AM

    Awesome post. I so good to see someone taking the time to share this information

  13. Tifany Harlan on September 9, 2011 6:54 PM

    Intriguing post. I have been searching for some good resources for solar panels and discovered your blog. Planning to bookmark this one!

  14. Ileana Juenemann on September 16, 2011 12:30 PM

    I would like to say “wow” what a inspiring post. This is really great. Keep doing what you’re doing!!

  15. Rachael Garkow on September 21, 2011 10:46 AM

    Great read. Thanks for the info!

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind