One (the) big worry in nuclear power from fission processes is the creation of very heavy atoms, those more heavy than the uranium used for fuel – such as curium and actinium. The group is called “actinides,” the heavy elements that can take millions of years to get through half-lives to less radioactive states. The idea of containing such things for very long periods sets even the most callous thoughts on edge as millions of years of storage managed by mankind isn’t an idea that builds confidence. Especially as these elements would be a dirty bomb maker’s dream component.

To “eliminate” these materials requires a transmutation into elements of either non-radioactive or much shorter half-lives. Helmut Leeb and Erwin Jericha at the Vienna University of Technology with collaboration at CERN’s n TOF Facility will continue their work with a restart of the facility’s neutron reactor, called the Accelerator Driven System. The new concept is an “undercritical reactor” meaning it can’t run so that the reaction is self-sustaining.

UVT n Tof Actinide Reactor

UVT n Tof Actinide Reactor

The neutrons necessary for an undercritical reactor operation are supplied by a proton accelerator with a spallation target located in the reactor core. “During the spallation, the atomic nuclei of the target (mainly lead) are broken with high-energy protons, while a large number of neutrons are normally released, neutrons which are necessary for the stationary operation of the reactor. If the accelerator is turned off, the chain reaction ceases,” Leeb explains. Worldwide, studies are based on the assumption that at least two decades will be necessary to transfer this concept to the industrial level, a concept that is fully understood at the scientific level. But, that may change as the collaborators proceed.

The prerequisite for this development is a thorough knowledge of the neutrons’ interaction and reactions with other materials as developed so far. In 2000, the n Tof facility became operative at CERN, which is a unique facility in the world, especially suitable for measuring the reactions of radioactive materials when bombarded with neutrons. Between 2002 and 2005, a large number of radiative captures and fission reactions, previously insufficiently known, were measured as part of a European Union project, in which nuclear physicists from TU Vienna were deeply involved. Due to an operational pause for the construction of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, now the consortium can restart the operations at the upgraded n_TOF facility with a new target. The first series of experiments are neutron radiative captures on iron and nickel, which are to be analyzed by the Viennese nuclear physicists.

UVT n Tof Targeting Setup

UVT n Tof Targeting Setup

“The core concept of transmutation – which was formulated as early as mid 20th century – consists of irradiating the actinides by fast neutrons. The highly stimulated nuclei that are generated this way suffer a fission, which leads to relatively short-lived nuclei, which in turn rapidly disintegrate into stable isotopes. Then, they cease to be radioactive,” explained Professor Leeb. Thus, the required radioactive waste isolation time of several millions years could be decreased to 300 and up to 500 years. The technological progress made in the last decades has made the transmutation possible at the industrial level.

Another way to burn the heavy actinides is in research by a consortium between Americans and Russians where the heavy atoms are added to a thorium fuel reactor and burned.

Leeb points out another path, the “thorium-uranium cycle,” an alternative nuclear fuel, which leads to a reduced incidence of radioactive waste. “Thorium is a potential nuclear fuel, which may be incubated into a light uranium isotope, whose fission generates basically no actinide. Furthermore, thorium can be found approximately five times more often than uranium. However, special reactors must be still developed for this, reactors that would be appropriate for the reaction pattern and for the somewhat harder gamma radiation. India is one of the countries that already host experiments with thorium in reactor cores,” said Leeb.

That adds another way or discussion point to offer in the effort to increase fission based power production. There is good reason to have concern for the isolation of the actinide share of nuclear waste and its safekeeping. Better still will be the methods that use the materials in a fuel burning leaving nothing at all of concern behind. Even as the Viennese physicist’s effort might come up not necessary if burning in thorium reactors comes of age, the research is worthwhile. Driving to more transmutation skills, processes and results could offer many other potential paths to produce materials of great use.


11 Comments so far

  1. BILL HANNAHAN on September 26, 2008 4:09 PM

    This is all because some bonehead nuclear engineer decided reactor dynamics was too boring and needed to be spiced up. So he choose to use the word “critical” to describe steady state operation,

    Imagine you are cruising across Kansas on the interstate with your foot resting on the throttle in just the right position to maintain 70mph effortlessly, you are “critical”. Now you come to a slight down slope in the highway, and you don’t want to move your foot off the sweet spot. The speed starts increasing, 71, 72, you are “supercritical.”

    Are you in great danger, are you about to die? Not really, whenever you see the word “critical” just substitute “stable” or “steady”.

    Subcritical reactors must be designed with a multiplication factor almost equal to one in order to achieve high power levels and high burn up rates. A poorly designed subcritical reactor could be vastly more dangerous than a well designed conventional reactor.

    “Thus, the required radioactive waste isolation time of several millions years….”

    This is only true for such wastes as coal slag containing lead, cadmium, arsenic etc. Spent fuel becomes less radioactive than uranium ore in 0.13 million years. See page 5 of this document, page 18 of the pdf.

    Notice that fresh spent fuel is only about 1000 times more radiotoxic than uranium ore. Ore is scattered throughout the earths crust with no engineered containment at all and may cause over 30,000 deaths per year from radon exposure. If humans provide 1000 times more reliable isolation than nature spent fuel is safer than ore right from the start.

    Breeder reactors like the integral fast reactor can generate an 80 year lifetime supply of electricity on 6 ounces of uranium and produce waste that is less toxic than ore in 300 years.

  2. forex robot on November 18, 2009 7:10 AM

    Good article as usual!

  3. dental hygiene on November 8, 2010 5:06 AM

    If you could e-mail me with a few suggestions on just how you made your blog look this excellent, I would be grateful.

  4. cheap clothing on November 22, 2010 2:09 AM

    good engerneering

  5. Trudi Janacek on May 24, 2011 9:42 AM

    Awesome post. I so good to see someone taking the time to share this information

  6. gclub on August 19, 2011 3:19 AM

    I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you make this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz reply as I’m looking to construct my own blog and would like to know where u got this from. kudos

  7. Leanne Shulthess on August 27, 2011 9:14 AM

    I was just having a conversation over this I am glad I came across this it cleared some of the questions I had.

  8. Laura Lough on August 31, 2011 8:22 AM

    Intriguing post. I have been searching for some good resources for solar panels and discovered your blog. Planning to bookmark this one!

  9. Williams Feusier on September 27, 2011 12:19 AM

    Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink – bookmark this site? Regards, Reader

  10. Inge Ridlen on October 4, 2011 5:40 AM

    Awesome post. I so good to see someone taking the time to share this information

  11. underground water tanks on January 13, 2012 1:13 PM

    cool thanks for Reisadvies sharing! btw exist feeds to your blog? I want to add these to my reader Finnaly i came across your postkeep blogging Damn ! I simply found a blunder inside your website! Check if css is managed right!

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind