Some readers might know what a Stirling engine is and how it works. For a pretty complete review of the history and engineering designs, some of which are in production today, see the Wikipedia – Stirling Engine.

Meanwhile, a Stirling engine most simply explained, is an engine that uses a working gas that travels back and forth between two cylinders warmed going one way to add energy and cooling while going the other using the difference in pressure to drive the pistons within into motion. For examples and animation see Wikipedia’s – Sterling Engine.

Air motors are designs that use compressed air to drive an output shaft. Some newer designs are extremely efficient and offer the real possibility of operating in a hybrid design in place of batteries. But the thermodynamic price, the heating of gas to compression and the cooling in expansion greatly diminish the efficiency. Undeterred by the thermodynamic issues some inventors will be offering short-range vehicles imminently, that while not solving the thermodynamic issue, offer low cost vehicles that have very low operating expenses.

These new designs just beg the question, could the Stirling engine principles be applied?

The problem of air motors with the thermodynamic losses and the matter that the compressed air needs a means to be compressed which uses energy might be neatly solved when the Stirling principle is applied to a pair of such motors.

In particular I am impressed by the near friction free design of Angelo Di Pietro of Brooklyn Australia. This design is reputed to be the current height of efficiency; minimalist and might very well offer a stunning Stirling principle opportunity. A pair of these astonishing little engines rigged with a regenerator (heat exchanger) and a gas heating system might offer a path to very high efficiency Stirling engines, which could be used in a broad array of applications. The small dimensions and likely, low cost manufacturing might even offer the prospect of a retrofit industry for current motor vehicle, construction and farm engines.

Another Stirling advantage is that the combustion is a continuous process that is much easier to build for efficiency and to control emissions. For example, your car might, in optimal form, be 25% efficient, but 95+% efficient furnaces are readily available. The technology and engineering to add the heat efficiently to a Sterling’s re-circulating gas is already in use. There is a lot of available gain if top air motor designs can be designed to work as Sterling engines. Please click on Mr. Di Pietro’s EngineAir site and offer encouragement.

For more information about the EngineAir motor and Mr. Di Pietro try the PesWiki.


6 Comments so far

  1. rick blazecka on November 11, 2009 4:47 PM

    “In particular I am impressed by the near friction free design of Angelo Di Pietro of Brooklyn Australia. This design is reputed to be the current height of efficiency;”

    I enquired by email to Di Pietro exactly what is the efficiency of his motor – no reply – where do you get your information? Who says it is near friction-free? He has to have side seals somewhere that cause friction just like everyone else. Where do you get your info – from other publishers? Please explain so I too can believe!

  2. Paul on May 21, 2010 10:17 PM

    Good on you Rick. The real losses in an air motors are air leakage, friction & heat loss of the compressed air. An enormous amount of heat is generated compressing the air, which is lost to the air. Even more energy is lost when the air expands through the motor. The most efficient and the only frictionless motor is an air turbine motor with magnetic bearings. Even if his motor is frictionless, the only advantage is that it runs at slower, more useable speeds than a turbine motor without the need of reduction gearing. I cannot believe that the Di Pietro motor is more efficient than any other commercially available motor.

  3. tchibo gutschein on August 3, 2010 11:24 PM

    🙂 cool!

  4. Pandiyan Siva on January 13, 2012 5:58 AM

    Good Morning sir,
    In the air compressed motor cycle system give good efficiency for only 2 km . how to increase the efficiency . if we replaced the storage tank by air compressor mean it will give good efficiency or not ?????

  5. concrete rainwater tanks on January 13, 2012 12:03 PM

    Whoa! that post was quite helpful thanks.

  6. internet marketing gold coast on January 14, 2012 12:02 PM

    Exactly how did you figure all of this out about this topic? I enjoyed reading this, Ill must visit other pages on your site immediately.

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind