<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thorium Fuel Gets a Break in The Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/</link>
	<description>News and Views for Making and Saving Money in New Energy and Fuel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Lough</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-484441</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Lough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3769#comment-484441</guid>
		<description>Nice post! You truly have a wonderful way of writing which I find captivating! I will definitely be bookmarking you and returning to your blog. In fact, your post reminded me about a strange thing that happened to me the other day. I’ll tell you about that later…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! You truly have a wonderful way of writing which I find captivating! I will definitely be bookmarking you and returning to your blog. In fact, your post reminded me about a strange thing that happened to me the other day. I’ll tell you about that later…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haywood Rochin</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-419310</link>
		<dc:creator>Haywood Rochin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 03:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3769#comment-419310</guid>
		<description>I REALLY liked your post and blog! It took me a minute bit to find your site…but I bookmarked it. Would you mind if I posted a link back to your post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I REALLY liked your post and blog! It took me a minute bit to find your site…but I bookmarked it. Would you mind if I posted a link back to your post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medicine Ball Exercises</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-94171</link>
		<dc:creator>Medicine Ball Exercises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3769#comment-94171</guid>
		<description>Beneficial info and excellent design you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your ideas and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneficial info and excellent design you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your ideas and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Christianson</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-52857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Christianson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3769#comment-52857</guid>
		<description>There is an excellent article on LFTR by Kirk Sorenson in the March 18,2010 issue of Machine Design magazine. The article is clear and concise. To answer Vegard, I would hazard a guess that inorganic chemistry and nuclear physics would be a good start. Beryllium fluoride is hazardous stuff to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an excellent article on LFTR by Kirk Sorenson in the March 18,2010 issue of Machine Design magazine. The article is clear and concise. To answer Vegard, I would hazard a guess that inorganic chemistry and nuclear physics would be a good start. Beryllium fluoride is hazardous stuff to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegard</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-37680</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3769#comment-37680</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know what kind of education is needed to do research/work with Thorium as a nuclear energy source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what kind of education is needed to do research/work with Thorium as a nuclear energy source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Musson</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/28/thorium-fuel-gets-a-break-in-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-37373</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Musson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3769#comment-37373</guid>
		<description>Uranium reactors already have places like Savanna River where their biproducts can be processed out (into Bomb grade material and waste).  There is no existing facility to handle the waste from Thorium. (which is modest in comparison to U reactors.)  This will need to be a multi-billion dollar facility. 

Of course, the other obstical is the permitting.  

It&#039;s still easier to get a permit for a uranium reactor that creates significant bomb-grade material and has possible melt-down issues.  

Still - the advantages of LFTR are overwhelming.  Once the reprocessing plant is in place for THorium - Coal fired utilities could economically be converted to Thorium reactors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uranium reactors already have places like Savanna River where their biproducts can be processed out (into Bomb grade material and waste).  There is no existing facility to handle the waste from Thorium. (which is modest in comparison to U reactors.)  This will need to be a multi-billion dollar facility. </p>
<p>Of course, the other obstical is the permitting.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still easier to get a permit for a uranium reactor that creates significant bomb-grade material and has possible melt-down issues.  </p>
<p>Still &#8211; the advantages of LFTR are overwhelming.  Once the reprocessing plant is in place for THorium &#8211; Coal fired utilities could economically be converted to Thorium reactors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

