<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/</link>
	<description>News and Views for Making and Saving Money in New Energy and Fuel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril R.</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-36738</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3622#comment-36738</guid>
		<description>No, its less than a factor of 2 increase in power density. The 7x more claim depends largely on the fact that the space base solar power system would have 3-5x higher capacity factor compared to typical land based solar systems.

Curiously, the space based solar idea doesn&#039;t offer significant area savings on the planet due to the very large area required for the terrestrial absorber. The real question therefore is whether this can compete with land based solar with storage and HVDC such as solar thermal with thermal storage or PV farms with pumped hydro. Once properly sited, a solar farm with storage is quite dependable and one can use biogas for occasional weeks of prolonged clouds. It seems to me that such a combination would be much more practical than space solar power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, its less than a factor of 2 increase in power density. The 7x more claim depends largely on the fact that the space base solar power system would have 3-5x higher capacity factor compared to typical land based solar systems.</p>
<p>Curiously, the space based solar idea doesn&#8217;t offer significant area savings on the planet due to the very large area required for the terrestrial absorber. The real question therefore is whether this can compete with land based solar with storage and HVDC such as solar thermal with thermal storage or PV farms with pumped hydro. Once properly sited, a solar farm with storage is quite dependable and one can use biogas for occasional weeks of prolonged clouds. It seems to me that such a combination would be much more practical than space solar power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Westenhaus</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-36516</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Westenhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3622#comment-36516</guid>
		<description>Interesting point from Russ.  But checking the available spectrum and the energy, seven is times is a valid but optimal multiplier.  The atmosphere and the magnetosphere are significant barriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point from Russ.  But checking the available spectrum and the energy, seven is times is a valid but optimal multiplier.  The atmosphere and the magnetosphere are significant barriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-36504</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3622#comment-36504</guid>
		<description>&#039;Space based solar also could collect as much as 7 times more power per area unit as the collector isn’t blocked by the atmosphere.&#039;

The above statement is new to me - not even close to correct is it?

The project got regulatory OK? The headline is totally smoke - they just said that if the power was competitive PG&amp;E could buy it.

İ hope PG&amp;E is not being allowed to invest any funds whatsoever in this until it is a bit father along than just dreams!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Space based solar also could collect as much as 7 times more power per area unit as the collector isn’t blocked by the atmosphere.&#8217;</p>
<p>The above statement is new to me &#8211; not even close to correct is it?</p>
<p>The project got regulatory OK? The headline is totally smoke &#8211; they just said that if the power was competitive PG&amp;E could buy it.</p>
<p>İ hope PG&amp;E is not being allowed to invest any funds whatsoever in this until it is a bit father along than just dreams!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy and Fuel -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-36368</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy and Fuel -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3622#comment-36368</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by smartecoliving, Richard Walthers. Richard Walthers said: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy ... http://ow.ly/1689No [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by smartecoliving, Richard Walthers. Richard Walthers said: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK | New Energy &#8230; <a href="http://ow.ly/1689No" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1689No</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy &#8230; &#124; Solar General</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-36364</link>
		<dc:creator>Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy &#8230; &#124; Solar General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3622#comment-36364</guid>
		<description>[...] See original here: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See original here: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK | New Energy &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/12/10/space-based-solar-energy-deal-gets-the-regulatory-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-36363</link>
		<dc:creator>Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenergyandfuel.com/?p=3622#comment-36363</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original post: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK &#124; New Energy &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original post: Space Based Solar Energy Deal Gets The Regulatory OK | New Energy &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

