Comments on: EEStor Signs a Major New Contract

By: pell grant

pell grant — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:35:33 +0000

Beneficial info and excellent design you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your ideas and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Great work!

By: David Kelly

David Kelly — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:53:50 +0000

Interesting claims but Stonepath Power Systems Ltd. discussed with Polarity its high voltage to low voltage power converter technology in 2003 and provided the first samples in 2004. A patent application was applied for Stonepath’s bi-directional power converter in 2005 and it is expected to be granted in around six months. There is a generation three of the power converter available, the changes are to lower cost of manufacture and increase efficiency to as high as 95%. Stonepath discontinued its association with Polarity in 2005 and there are no technology licensing agreements between our companies. With all very new technologies customers need to ensure that the company they work with actually own or have rights of use of a technology to prevent any risk of future liabilities.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:31:22 +0000

It’s obvious that they are putting everything on the line and making great strides. Yet people still question it because “science says it can’t work”. But there are plenty of things that CW/science has been wrong on. If everything was known, new bridge designs or machinery wouldn’t fail. But they do.

Anyway, for the amount of money and effort that’s gone into this let alone the 3rd parties involved, there is probably more than a convincing argument going on. Enough people have seen enough to put millions on the line despite the general complaint that ‘they don’t have anything’.

This is a total game-changer. Weir is smart in not showing his hand early because he knows what he has, which is revolution. Personally I think it’s important enough to nationalize it but then again I wouldn’t want the government to manage my toilet let alone this technology. Just open up 200 factories with 10 production lines apiece. Give them all the money the need. So far, they do seem to be getting everything they need so we can be confident something will be coming out the other end.

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:22:55 +0000

Boeing, an aircraft company with decades of experience building commercial jet aircraft, is years behind on it’s new 787 Dreamliner. Why is it surprizing that Eestor would have trouble commercializing an entirely new technology?

I thought it was interesting that in his leaked interview, Wier admitted that the original dry formula process could not be made to work. So, they developed the new aqueous BT from scratch. It illustrates the kind of problems that you have introducing new technologies.

By: voxelman

voxelman — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:01:30 +0000

Dittos to what Wheelo said.

This kind of devise is more commonly referred to as a DC to DC converter.

By: Wheelo

Wheelo — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:40:06 +0000

Many of us who have followed the story for a long time believe that the truth or fiction of Eestor will be upon us soon. There is a blog site not mentioned in this article where most everybody follows Eestor, http://www.theeestory.com. As an aside, the only way to participate in the deal yourself is to buy Zenn Motors stock, since they have an exclusive deal with Eestor to license the technology for cars about Camry size on down, plus, Zenn owns 10% of Eestor, so Zenn stockholders can participate in all of Eestor’s other markets. As a speculative play, it’s a fun one. Don’t bet more than you can loose. Could be like Microsoft, could be nothing.