Whether that validates his theory is another question. He claims in his free three part ebook to have wrapped up a lot of loose ends in cosmology, and basic physics and so on, which of course would have made Einstein very happy as mentioned above. The guy is really articulate and his math seems impressive to me. Since Einstein invoked God (contra gambler) I will too – a simpler and much more elegant theory, like Mills’, has a lot of sex appeal, and God is into elegant rather than kludgy. Not to mention Occan’s razor.

So if a Swiss patent clerk can change the game, why not Dr. Mills? I’m tired of these NSF funded cry babies who are quick to mount a political ad hominem attack but can’t be bothered to read and analyze a radical claim like Mills’ for themselves, as though it the very possibility of a truly paradigm shifting idea coming from outside their academic cloister was unthinkable or heretical.

That being said, there is a claim of a more mainstream reconciliation of Mills’ experimental results and accepted theory, in the form of “Hydrino as relativistic hydrogen” put forward by Francis Roarty (http://www.byzipp.com/hydrino/). He posits relativistic phenomena as the basis for Mills’ energy device results. More importantly there is a patent already filed on the exploitation of this phenomenology, somewhat as he conceptualizes it. The question is, how would a legal challenge assert that the energy release is indeed the result of the effect described in the patent, rather than as a result of Mills’ theoretical 1/n energy state hydrinos? It will be interesting to see whether the patent holders will assert against Mills/BLP, seeking perhaps royalties. The only way to settle that would be to definitively prove or disprove Mills’ basic theory, as far as I can see but I’m not a real IP guru or anything.

What are you doing to make the world better??
Oh thats right….nothing!
At least this guy is trying!
Even if his theories are wrong and his ‘invention’ goes bust. At least he tried!
I doubt he’s ’scamming’ people on purpose, he probably honestly believes hes onto something.

I also wonder that if he really did have something going on here… why the oil companies haven’t stepped in and put the kabosh on it either by buying him out or hiring a professional to ummm… terminate the project.

A little advice to the blog poster:

Whenever you see the claims of a “new energy source” that will “revolutionize everything”, be highly suspect. If the subject will also claim to have solved “Quantum Physics and General Relativity”, hit the snooze button. It’s definitely a hoax. I mean, there is a TON of sites just like these, waiting for the gullibility of journalists and venture capitalists.

Grow the **** up. Such naiveté is a crime in the age of Google.

if Dr. Mills’ theory is proved right, then so will Einstein.

Although Einstein made a major contribution to quantum mechanics with the nobel-price winning explanation of the photoelectric effect, he never fully accepted the then new quantum theory. He especially disliked what he called “spooky action at a distance” and the element of randomness inherent in the theory. His words “gods doesn’t place dice” became famous.

Einstin was trying for much of his life to find a closed-form theory eliminating the element of randomness und unifying general relativity (his own invention) with quantum theory.

So, if Dr. Mills’s theory is right and works, it would in a way also be Einstein greatest triumph.